In an unprecedented revelation, a comprehensive analysis of the estimated IQ levels of 195 world leaders has surfaced, igniting debates over intelligence and decision-making capabilities on the global stage. This striking report, which evaluates leaders from Afghanistan to Zambia, reveals a spectrum of intellect that could reshape our understanding of international governance.

Among the standout figures is Argentina’s Javier Milei, boasting an impressive IQ of 135, placing him at the pinnacle of global leadership intelligence. In stark contrast, Angola’s João Lourenço is alarmingly low, with an estimated IQ of just 25, raising eyebrows about the implications for his nation. The report also highlights leaders like Belgium’s Alexander De Croo, with an IQ of 132, and Finland’s Alexander Stubb at 128, both showcasing the intellectual prowess that often correlates with effective governance.

However, the findings are not without controversy. Leaders such as Cuba’s Miguel Díaz-Canel (IQ of 127) and Australia’s Anthony Albanese (125) are positioned alongside those with significantly lower scores, prompting discussions on the role of intelligence in political success. Notably, countries like Liberia and Fiji present leaders with estimated IQs of 109 and 4, respectively, stirring concerns about the capacity for sound leadership in these nations.

The implications of these IQ levels extend beyond mere numbers; they challenge the very fabric of how we perceive leadership effectiveness and the potential for change in global politics. As this information circulates, the world watches closely, questioning whether intelligence truly equates to wisdom in governance. The stakes are high as nations grapple with the consequences of electing leaders whose intellectual capabilities could shape their futures. Stay tuned for more updates on this evolving story.